• info@seatiniuganda.org
  • +256 707481726
SEATINI
  • Home
  • Contact
  • info@seatiniuganda.org
  • +256 707481726
SEATINI
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Our Vision, Mission & Values
    • Our Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Our Partners
  • Thematic Areas
    • Trade, Investment & Sustainable Development
    • Financing for Development
    • Building Alternatives for Social & Economic Justice
  • RESOURCES
    • Blog and Newsroom
    • Career Centre
    • Events
      • Upcoming Events
      • Past Events
    • Publications
      • Policy Briefs
      • Discussion Papers
      • Research Studies
      • Annual Reports
      • Downloads
    • Newsletter
    • Media Center
      • Statements/Position Papers
      • Photo Gallery
      • Videos
      • Press Releases
    • Tenders
    • Forum
  • Engage With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback and complaints

As WTO Dispute Settlement System Collapses, Civil Society Calls Attention to Need for Fundamental Change in Global Trade Regime

Homepage News As WTO Dispute Settlement System Collapses, Civil Society Calls Attention to Need for Fundamental Change in Global Trade Regime
News

As WTO Dispute Settlement System Collapses, Civil Society Calls Attention to Need for Fundamental Change in Global Trade Regime

December 10, 2019
By SEATINI
0 Comment
514 Views

On 11th December 2019 in Geneva, the WTO’s flagship dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) will cease to be functional, as the United States has blocked appointments to the Appellate Body (AB) and thus the outcomes of cases will no longer be able to be enforced.

“This is one more blatant example of the US attempting to assert an imperial role: if an entity does not do exactly what the US government thinks is in its interest, then the US will attempt to bypass, emasculate, or destroy that entity. Other states should recognize this for what it is, an abuse of power, and retaliate in any way they can, for example by announcing that they will no longer comply with TRIPS, will no longer support the moratorium on e-transmissions, and will join France and others in taxing the e-commerce giants,” said Richard Hill, President of the Association for Proper Internet Governance.

“We take note that most developing countries and LDCs have not been major users of the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism. Indeed, 80 to 90 percent of all disputes involve either at least one high-income country or at least one upper-middle-income country. Many least developed countries (LDCs) have never participated in the dispute settlement system as a complainant or respondent. Nevertheless, the Appellate Body remains a critical part of the entire WTO rules-based system. Whether they actively use it or not, developing Members have the most to gain by a system where rules can be enforced” says Jane Nalunga, Country Director, SEATINI-Uganda.

“The real crisis in the WTO is the crisis of the tremendous harm to people around the world from the neo-liberal economic order, encapsulated by the WTO. Now that the WTO’s enforcement is no longer operational, countries should restart using those policies which have been constrained by harmful WTO rules. For example, WTO rules constrain developing countries from supporting domestic farm production to feed their own people, but still allow rich countries to subsidize exported production. Now, food security can finally take precedence over WTO rules. Countries which have forked over millions of dollars to patent-holders can start not enforcing those development-starving patents – UNCTAD’s Trade and Development Report 2019 showed that patent receipts to OECD countries in 2017 to be upwards of $350 billion USD while developing countries received less than $10 billion. It’s time to stop enforcing TRIPS!” said Deborah James, facilitator of the global OWINFS network.

Background Information

At the time of the founding of the WTO, corporate elites hijacked “trade” and rigged the rules to distribute income upwards, while reducing protections for people who work. Highly paid professionals (like doctors) in rich countries are protected (by being able to regulate their own licensing) and businesses are given market access rights and predictability. Meanwhile workers are forced into unfair competition without a minimum floor for protections, and developing country workers have been kept at the lowest levels of the global value chains.

As rich countries have been allowed to maintain their level of agricultural subsidies (which are mostly handed out to large producers, not family farms), developing countries have not been allowed under WTO rules to subsidize food production for domestic consumption to guarantee food security, nor to protect their farmers from unfair dumping.

Unfair agriculture rules contribute to global food crises and the impoverishment of millions – there are still nearly a billion hungry people in the world – and keep developing countries from benefiting from fair trade. And yet the US is currently suing India in the WTO for implementing the largest food security programme in the history of the world.

In reality, the problem with the dispute system is that it adjudicates according to a set of rules guided by corporate interests. In the 45 cases in which members have tried to use public interest regulations as a defense in a case,commercial interests have won out 44 times.

Tags: Civil Society Global Trade WTO

Previous Story
CSO Statement on the Uganda-Mauritius Double Taxation Agreement
Next Story
Uganda Needs Well Negotiated Trade Agreements

Related Articles

Civil Society Groups Sue Uganda, Rwanda Over Border Closure

CSO Panelists addressing the media during the press conference. READ...

Civil society opposes reduction of Soda Tax

Most Read Posts

  • Making the Stimulus Package Work for MSMEs Tuesday, 16, Mar
  • TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONSULTANCY TO DESIGN SEATINI SOUTHERN AFRICA Tuesday, 22, Nov
  • Uganda Budget for FY 2019-2020; Tax measures Monday, 17, Jun
  • AN OPEN LETTER TO HIS EXCELLENCY THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA Monday, 31, Aug
  • Trade-Offs for Uganda’s Middle Income Status Tuesday, 9, Aug

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow us

Tweets by SeatiniU

Get in touch

The Southern and Eastern Africa Trade Information and Negotiations Institute – (SEATINI) Uganda

P. O Box, 3138, Kampala
Plot 806, Block 213, Bukoto-Kisasi Road – Kampala
– info@seatiniuganda.org
– +256 414 540856

Thematic Areas

  • Trade, Investment and Sustainable Development
  • Financing for Development
  • Building Alternatives for Social & Economic Justice
  • Equator School of Development Policy

Quick Links

  • Who we are
  • Join the Forum
  • Blog and Newsroom
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Engage with us

Connect with us

        

 

Join our mailing list


Copyright © 2020 SEATINI. All Rights Reserved
Translate »
SearchPostsLogin
Thursday, 26, Jan
Call For Suppliers’ Bids for 2023
Tuesday, 17, Jan
CSOs Share Perspectives on the National Budget Framework Paper for FY 2023/2024
Tuesday, 17, Jan
Unmasking the Secrecy behind Shell Companies
Saturday, 7, Jan
Graduate Trainee Vacancies
Friday, 16, Dec
ECONOMY TO GROW AT 5% IN 2023-SAYS WORLD BANK
Tuesday, 22, Nov
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONSULTANCY TO DESIGN SEATINI SOUTHERN AFRICA

Welcome back,

Need Help? Chat with us
Start a Conversation
Hi! Click one of our member below to chat on WhatsApp
The team typically replies in a few minutes.
Seatini Uganda